To My Seniors....

Seniors,

It's not likely that you'll remember me 10...15...20 years from now, but remember this:

1. Surround yourself with positive people. There are going to be some people that want drama just for the sake of drama. Avoid them at all costs.

2. Own your mistakes. You'll make a million wrong decisions in the next few years. Own it. Mistakes will shape you into who you'll become.

3. Understand the how. It's easy to "I know the answer", but to understand how something works is true knowledge. As Neil deGrasse Tyson says, "Knowing how to think empowers you far beyond those who only know what to think." 

That thing atop your shoulders is the most complicated thing in the known universe. Use it.

So that guy in the coffee shop or in the quad next year who is pontificating about religion, the government, or social issues might sound interesting, but be wary. He might be a ding dong....and is probably a philosophy major.

4. Be good to others. You might have been a big fish in a small pond here at GHS...Expect the opposite next year. You will meet others that are smarter, better looking, tougher, etc. Starting now the playing field is level, which means an ounce of humility will go a long way. Treat others with respect, regardless of your initial impression is of them.

Just know that, for many of you, high school will have been the easiest part of life for you. All those tests, long nights, drama....it was easy. Time to grow up.

I said for most of you it was easy. For those that struggled and knew of true hardships over the past four years, know this: You are better because of it. And, in many ways, you're a step ahead of the others because you made it. Best of luck to you all.

- Bott

"In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: IT GOES ON."
                                                                    - Robert Frost

Bott's Book of the Week- Mortality by Christopher Hitchens

.

I owe Christopher Hitchens. His writing is clear and visceral. He was an inspiration to anyone who felt bullied into following the norm. Hitch (and a few others) were the driving force behind a lot of my writings and my love of non-fiction. Before reading further, you should know a little about Hitch. His true field was journalism and his writing kept that ethos in tact until his last moments. His polemic nature made people hate him but respect him and granted, not everyone saw the appeal of his antagonistic writing, he made you think and could get a rise out of even the most solemn man. He was an outspoken critic of politics and religion. A self-described anti-theist, he debated nonstop in hopes to shed light on falsehoods and controversies. That said, here's my disclaimer: Hitchens is not for everyone.

This book chronicles Hitchens' diagnosis of esophageal cancer and the subsequent writings that stemmed from his diagnosis. Rarely do you get an author of such magnitude able to write knowing that the end is so near. Some things are borrowed from other Hitchens works, but if you've never read (and you should), you'll be able to see it within the context of the overall book.

It's hard. It's hard for one who has never read Hitchens in that you'll be enamored with his mastery of language and angry at yourself for not knowing about his bibliography beforehand. It's hard for those that have read Hitchens previously because you'll notice another tone. A sometimes softer tone. He still, in his sardonic way, fights the good fight against those who refuse to acknowledge the failures of their beliefs, but there's the sense of end. 

“To the dumb question ‘Why me?,’ ” he writes, “the cosmos barely bothers to return the reply: Why not?”

It's almost unfair to be this good at turning a phrase. On his cancer, he says:

"This alien can’t want anything; if it kills me it dies but it seems very single-minded and set in its purpose. No real irony here, though. Must take absolute care not to be self-pitying or self-centered.”

It's a short read, a powerful read, a worthwhile read for anyone. He drank, smoked, and lived life "burning the candle on both ends." But he lived. Whether it was attacking Al Sharpton on national television or shielding Salman Rushdie during the fatwa against him after The Satanic Verses, he kept his sense of self. He rubbed me the wrong way on many occasions and was terribly stubborn, but we lost him too soon. Those against him claim that the almighty robbed him of his voice with cancer of the throat. They evidently never read his writings, as his most prolific work (like Mortality) was inked on page after page of stinging verse and prose. If anyone truly wanted to rob him of his voice, they would have taken away hands- the pens and pencils- typewriters- computers. They would have taken away, slowly and painfully, his ability to put pen to paper. Even so, something tells me Hitchens would have found a way to speak. 

Bott's Book of the Week: The Humans by Matt Haig - A quick and quirky read!

Us humans are funny creatures. We really don't know how goofy we are, how strange we act, and how pompous we sound until we look at it from an independent lens. In The Humans by Matt Haig, that lens is owned by an alien and what he sees disgusts him....at first. 

Andrew Martin, a math professor from the very prestigious Cambridge University, has proven something called the Riemann Hypothesis. This hypothesis in the wrong hands could be catastrophic to the universe and guess what- humans are "the wrong hands." Martin must die, for he knows too much. He is replaced (so to speak) by an alien whose objective is to blend in and destroy those who know about the hypothesis. Blending in is a little difficult at first...sure, he's found wandering naked along a road, but how hard could it be to be human? 

The alien, whom I'll refer to as Martin now, is mortified by our mannerisms, food, and our obsession with violence. As he talks to people and finds those with knowledge of the Riemann Hypothesis, he begins to learn about us...and like us. Moreover, he begins to learn about belonging and love. 

The Humans is slightly philosophical with a touch of humor and runs the gamut of emotion. There's a sense of loss in Martin's voice and Haig does a wonderful job of looking at humans from a different perspective. I loved this book and it's a quick read for sure. It's not your traditional science fiction novel so those that don't tend to hit that genre will be happy they picked it up. It's a beautiful, heartwarming story!

The Humans

Bott's Book of the Week: The Stranger by Albert Camus

This is not a new book; however, anyone who wants a story that is more off the beaten path, give The Stranger a go.  

Written by Albert Camus and originally published in 1942, The Stranger tells the story of Meursault, an Algerian who is more than a little disconnected with life. We begin at his mother's funeral. For most of us, this is a somber moment that will often lead to reflection (at the very least). Meursault on the other hand doesn't care. Not even a bit. His actions are more aligned with a sociopathic egotist than a grieving son. He refuses to see the body and decides to smoke and have a cup of coffee right in front of the coffin. Why not, right? It's only your mom's funeral.

To boot, he runs into Marie, an old friend and former co-worker and he decides to leave and well...have some fun. Turns out he really doesn't care about her much either! So at this point we can paint Meursault with an apathetic brush- he's listless at best and has little to no sense of altruistic behavior. AAANNNDDD it only gets worse...

His buddy Raymond wants revenge. Meursault helps him. Meursault's lady friend wants love. He doesn't reciprocate. His moral compass isn't pointed north or south, but I doubt its existence at all. This leads to the watershed moment- a murder. Meursault kills a character, "The Arab" who is trailing Raymond and plotting his own revenge for what Raymond did to his sister. The Arab's run in with Meursault is tragic for both characters. Meursault shoots him and although the first bullet would have been enough, he fires again and again. 

This, of course, lands him in jail and although his lawyer assures him of a quick and easy trial. The judge finds Meursault as a cold, lifeless, emotionless human who shows no regard for the sanctity of human life. He is sentenced to death....

Throughout his conversations with the priest that visits him, we see Meursault descend deeper into the nihilistic vision he has perpetuated throughout the novel. Here's the thing, we're all Meursault. At some point we encounter a hardship that makes us want to just sip coffee in front of a coffin...ok bad analogy, but it's true. The great part about Camus' writing is he takes us into a world that we might not recognized ourselves as inhabiting until we see Meursault's actions and live through his antics. Not that we take it as far as he did, but Meursault's assault on God and the paradox of the meaningless universe at the very least makes us think (even if we disagree).

The Stranger can be depressing to some and absurd to others. There's nothing wrong with either so long as the you attempt to expand the character's purpose.

Bott's Review of the Week - Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey

Ok so it's not a book....well it kind of is. You see, back in the day there was an astronomer named Carl Sagan. He was an author as well as a champion of inquiry and wonder. His book Cosmos was published in 1980 and was a 13 chapter tour into the workings of the universe. It accompanied the miniseries whose 13 episode arc had me hooked from the first time I saw it on the terribly rendered VHS tapes I found laying around my aunt's house.

Even in fuzzy, poor audio, 1970's style hair, Carl Sagan delivered speeches on the origins of life, the vastness of space, and beauty of dying stars that were so eloquent I couldn't help but want to read more. I was thrilled when I heard Cosmos was coming back to TV and even more elated when I read that Neil deGrasse Tyson would be hosting it. Tyson himself is the author of many books and is probably best known now for hosting NOVA Science NOW on PBS and his guest roles on The Daily Show and Colbert Report. Anyone that has had Mrs. Pollack this year knows that I am a huge fan of NDT as I delivered a riveting speech in Mr. Tyson's voice during a debate.

Needless to say....I was not disappointed! For me, it was nostalgic and new all at once. This episode was more of an introduction entitled "Standing Up in the Milky Way" but it gave a bit of a snapshot into what's to come. It was a blend of visual elegance and animated shorts. This episode's animated feature centered around Giordano Bruno and his quest for the infinite. Bruno is quite well known and a bit of a hero in the world of cosmology in that his idea of an infinite universe was panned by the church who, in Bruno's time, was the authority on creation.

The most powerful part of the show was the cosmic calendar. Now, this has been told and done before, but I can't stress enough how much I love this comparison. The idea is to take the entire existence of the universe, all 13.8 billion years, and compress it into a calendar. I won't go through each month, but it makes the point that humans show up at 12:53 on December 31st. Our first writings, at 12:59:47- What does this mean? We are young, we are new. The universe has existed and will continue to exist without us. And while that may seem like a depressing idea, Cosmos will take us through a tour of the galaxy that will make question everything, including why we are here and what we should do with time we have. I can't wait for next week!

#geek

The Power of "I Don't Know"

I am slightly information obsessed. I suppose that's appropriate as an information scientist. I want to know and learn as much as I absolutely can, but this wasn't always the case. My patience and understanding have evolved over the years to the point where I am completely comfortable admitting that I may not know something. This wasn't an easy transition and is complicated by the fact that I want others to know or at the very least perceive me as an intelligent person. This commenced in high school and now, 14 years later, I feel like I can finally say "I don't know" without fear.

This partially stems from the notion that "I don't know" means something completely different to me now than it did 5 or 10 or 15 years ago. Recently, I had a conversation with one our seniors at GHS and he (who shall remain nameless) told me that he liked to argue almost for the sake of arguing and, moreover, had a real problem with admitting defeat whilst engaging in debate. He, like myself in high school, is under this odd 21st century perception that freely admitting ignorance about a topic removes himself from further discussion of that topic. I get it, I really do. When discussing politics or religion or history or science, it's tough to say those words- but I'm here to tell you IT'S OKAY! Why? Because here's what "I don't know" really means...

It means "I haven't discovered that yet."

It doesn't remove you from the conversation, it gives you an opportunity to discover something new. I know that everything is immediate today. If a response isn't given in 30 seconds and it's over 140 characters, it might as well never happen. We move on. We're done. What's the next topic? It's almost as if that when no response is given, those that last spoke win. There's no time to say, "You know, I don't know. Can I get back to you?" They're done with you. And let me assure you, that's okay.

The conversations, the true conversations that you have now will not only lay the foundation for further debates, but they will give more to talk about in the future. You don't know everything. You never will. But using "I don't know" as a springboard to further research and understanding will open your mind. And I can almost guarantee that if you do revisit a conversation with someone after the fact (and after you've learned more on the topic), it will benefit you both.

We are born not inherently good or evil, but inherently ignorant. It's human nature to yearn for knowledge as well as acceptance. But you are not validated by "likes" and retweets. In the end, validation comes from your own sense of self worth and discovery. Whether it's said out loud or a simple thought in your head, "I don't know" should not be the end of the conversation, but rather the starting point.

Bott's Book of the Week: The Future of the Mind...It's about your brain (that thing inside your head)

Michio Kaku is one of my favorite theoretical physicists. The fact that I have a list of favorite theoretical physicists is either a.) sad or b.) awesome. I'll go with the latter. This book discusses the most powerful thing in the known universe: Your brain. 

The book is broken into three sections and I can't tell you how much I appreciate that as a reader. Kaku is known for his research based analysis and most of this book centers on the what the future may hold for brain research. But the first portion lays the foundation in that it presents what is happening now in the field. It also gives a very pedestrian and quite thorough overview of how the brain itself works. 

Then we get weird...... 

Part 2 of the book discusses telepathy, telekinesis, and the coolest part- memories. This is of particular note because of the topic of Alzheimer's. Implanting memories is something that you might read about in a dystopian novel, but Kaku argues (and the research is out there), that uploading memories could be something that is very real in the shockingly near future. I love this idea, especially when applied to information. I was (and still am) terrible at math. If you put a check on the table at a restaurant, it will take me an inordinate amount of time to calculate the tip. I try my best to understand the complicated math whilst reading about physics and quantum theory, but I missed the boat on the numbers game. Now imagine if you're struggling in a subject like I was with math. Wouldn't it be great to simply upload whatever you needed to learn? Ancient Greek philosophy? Biology? Any language?

HOWEVER, the idea that intrigues me is I could upload any information to my brain and have it stick as a memory. This could be applicable to any information in any subject. What does that mean for the future, though? Are we talking about turning the human mind into a computer? In a sense, it already is. The brain has, that we know of, a limitless amount of space and can store massive amounts of memory. 

On the third and final front, Kaku blends the human mind with the universe. How might everything that he spoke to in parts 1 & 2 coalesce to alter our destiny. Could we use our mind to reach across the universe? What does the altered state of consciousness mean to the definition of reality as we see it? This book is a great read, but just a warning- you may have to devote some major time to it. It took me a while because of the subject matter and terminology. 

So many questions....so much information....so many possibilities....so much suave hair

  

Look at that hair....LOOK AT IT!